
A question I’m often asked is how genetic predisposition to addiction mixes with environment to produce an addicted person. No one knows for sure, of course, but this study from the University of Georgia is further evidence that involved and supportive parents can often neutralize a genetic predisposition to substance abuse. What follows is a portion of the study’s full press release:
Athens, Ga. – A genetic risk factor that increases the likelihood that youth will engage in substance use can be neutralized by high levels of involved and supportive parenting, according to a new University of Georgia study.
“We found that involved and supportive parenting can completely override the effects of a genetic risk for substance abuse,” says study co-author Gene Brody, Regents Professor in the UGA College of Family and Consumer Sciences. “It’s a very encouraging finding that shows the power of parenting.”
Brody and his colleagues… focused their attention on a gene known as 5HTT that’s involved in the transport of the brain chemical serotonin. Most people carry two copies of the long version of the gene, but those with one or two copies of the short version have been shown in several studies to have a greater likelihood of consuming alcohol and other substances and to have higher levels of impulsivity and risk taking.
The researchers interviewed 253 African-American families in rural Georgia over a four-year period. The researchers found that nearly 60 percent of the youth had two copies of the long gene, while the remainder had one or two copies of the short gene that confers risk. As expected, the use of substances was low among 11 year-olds and increased as the youth aged. By age 14, 21 percent of the youth had smoked cigarettes, 42 percent had used alcohol, five percent had drank heavily and five percent had used marijuana.
Among youth with the genetic risk factor, those who received low levels of involved and supportive parenting increased their substance use at rate three times higher than youth with high levels of parental support. Among youth with high levels of involved and supportive parenting, the difference in substance abuse was negligible – regardless of genetic risk.
“In families that were characterized by strong relationships between children and their parents, the effect of the genetic risk was essentially zero,” said Beach, who is also a Distinguished Research Professor in the psychology department of the UGA Franklin College of Arts and Sciences. “With this study and previous studies looking at environmental risk factors such as poverty, we’re finding that in many cases the best way to help children is to help families become more resilient.”
I’m guessing that–when parents are not available–mentors and adults who take a genuine interest in a child enhance resilience in at-risk children and adolescents. Good article, Benoit.
In her book, FOR YOUR OWN GOOD: Hidden Cruelty in Child-Rearing and the Roots of Violence, Alice Miller calls these replacement adults “enlightened witnesses” for the child and sees them as making the difference between the child’s survival and destruction. Miller also sees the results of child abuse manifested in one of two ways by the abused child, and sometimes both: substance abuse and criminality.